Follow us on

Dvd

No Country For Old Men

No Country For Old Men

2008
In a filmic match made in heaven, The Mighty Coen Brothers adapt lyrical novelist Cormac McCarthy's 'No Country For Old Men'.

This, the Coen's first work from a non-original story, is a darkly comic, violent western/thriller that follows a hunter (Brolin) who discovers dead bodies, a stash of heroin and $2 million in cash on the Rio Grande.

Starring Javier Bardem, Tommy Lee Jones, Josh Brolin, Woody Harrelson, Kelly Macdonald

Directed by Joel Coen ('The Big Lebowski', 'Fargo', 'The Man Who Wasn't There', 'Barton Fink', 'Raising Arizona', 'O Brother, Where Art Thou?'), Ethan Coen

Written by Joel Coen, Ethan Coen (based on the novel by Cormac McCarthy)

Cinematography Roger Deakins

Festivals & Awards Best Film at the Academy Awards 2008 | Best Director at the Academy Awards and BAFTAs | Best Supporting Actor (Bardem) at the Academy Awards, BAFTAs and Golden Globes | Best Adapted Screnplay at Academy Awards, BAFTAs and Golden Globes

Thriller, Drama, Crime, Adaptation | 2hr 2mins | Rated (R16) | Contains Graphic violence | Origin: USA | Official Site »

Trailers
Reviews
  • SHARE:
    Tweet This Send to Facebook Email View more services

The Talk

No votes / No comments

-

Want to see it

What say you? Yes No

  •  

     

  • Be the first to comment!

  •  

     

Get it off your chest:

Want to see it?

Flicks review

  •  5

    Thoughtful, abstract, beautiful, and absolutely thrilling, the masterful Coen Brothers have excelled themselves again with this intelligent modern western.

    The ensemble acting is phenomenal. The standout performance is, of course, Javier Bardem as psychopathic killer Anton Chigurh. His creation is the creepiest, nastiest, most inhuman nightmare anyone could ever hope to meet (but if you did, he’d probably kill you too). Josh Brolin is also very tough as flawed hero Llewelyn Moss. But the glue that holds the film together is Tommy Lee Jones as Sheriff Bell. It’s a perfect role for Jones, and takes advantage of his wrinkled face and slow drawl to depict a man out of his depth in the modern world, longing for the simplicity of the days of old.

    Set in 80s Texas, the opening tableau shows a selection of landscape shots, each one with the sun a little higher in the sky. By the time local hunter Llewlyn Moss has arrived on the scene, the harsh desert light almost blinds us. One can almost feel the crackling heat radiating from the screen. Widescreen framing is used to full effect: when a drug deal gone wrong is first revealed to us from the vantage point of a rocky bluff, the bullet-ridden dead bodies look like little ants in the far distance.

    The suspense is killer. Hitchcock would be sick with jealousy. In particular, take the scene with Brolin holed up in a hotel room as Bardem’s deliberate footsteps clomp ever closer. It’s edge-of-the-seat stuff, and absolutely thrilling. The Coens take delight in peppering the soundtrack with tiny details; a key turning in a lock, the click of a light switch, the minimalist beep of a radio transmitter.

    It comes as some surprise, then, to learn that the thematic concerns of the piece don’t simply rely on quickening the audience’s heartbeat. In fact, the third act of the film may come as a shock. In many ways it abandons the taut thriller structure that has thus far been established, and becomes instead a quiet inward-looking contemplative look at the changing face of evil. On immediate viewing, this may seem something of a downer; a fizzling out into something more obscure, leaving some of us scratching our heads and others vocally outraged. But, on reflection, it’s an intelligent and thoughtful way to conclude a cracker of a film. It will leave you with something to think about.

    Agree? Disagree?...

The people's reviews

16 reviews

  • Brilliant

     5

    Jo

    Nobody (?)

    Beautifully made, great story and Bardem was the man!

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • See the movie then read the book

     4

    Mark

    Nobody (?)

    I really enjoyed the movie primarily for Anton Chigurh's murderous single-mindedness. I vote for him to be the poster child for human evolution, the Che Guevara for survival of the fittest.

    This is a fascinating set of story lines but you're better off reading the book if you can't understand the movie. The Coen brothers have taken four significant shortcuts that are like stutters, stumbles, or myoclonic jerks (the Coens are so expert they can literally sleepwalk the production of a movie) in the flow of the film. For example, how does the killer find the killer sent to kill him - if you want to know then read the book.

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • No Country for Old Men - film review (www.bromagazine.com)

     5

    Luke Mason

    Nobody (?)

    ‘No Country for Old Men’ is a sinister and malevolently crafted film that has stellar performances from all its cast members. It is two hours jam-packed full of intensity with great characters and a compelling plot-line.
    The film is based on the 2003 novel by Cormac McCarthy, starring Josh Brolin, Tommy Lee Jones, Woody Harrelson and Javier Bardem. ‘No Country for Old Men’ is about the violence and mayhem that result after a hunter (Brolin), comes across dead bodies, a stash of heroin and more than 2 million dollars cash near the Rio Grande; an obvious drug-deal gone wrong. Instead of doing the right thing, the hunter decides to pocket it all for himself and from there; things go from bad to worse. A seriously disturbed killer is on his tail and a jaded cop (Jones) who seems to always be three steps behind.

    The film has an eclectic mix of peaks and troughs that leave you transfixed throughout. The Coen brothers haven’t made a film this gripping since Fargo and with their quintessential structural trademark of breaking conventional story, this film will rattle the most settled viewer. They have achieved an unpredictable and disturbing film that is coated in paramount originality that stays true to the original story.

    However, the loyalty to the viewer is tarnished and compromised in favour for a stronger and grittier story and characters. There is no real sense of pay-off for the audience. Justice is not apparent in this film and may leave many patient, mainstream viewers angry and annoyed. The story doesn't gratify the viewers need for good to overcome evil. But it delivers everything else and has done well at the Oscars.

    Moreover, the Coens are not the type of film-makers to cave into studio bosses or viewer demands. And the result is a film that has kept true to the author’s vision, their need for originality, critical acclaim and Oscar awards.

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • who do I dislike enough to recommend they watch this?

     1

    RA from Hamilton

    Nobody (?)

    Left in fits of laughter that we'd sat through it and it never got any good. wondered who we would send to it as punishment.

    Will be more careful in future.

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • outstanding

     5

    helena

    Nobody (?)

    in the hitchcock genre

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • never seen such a range of views about one flick as the Flicks user reviews below.

     3

    Brian1

    Superstar (?)

    "Flicks" review indicates an infatuation with the Coen Bros.
    I cannot find the merit suggested by their review, but suggest you read it and then go see for yourself.

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • Review

     4

    DG

    Nobody (?)

    It was a movie for the hardcore film fanatics! Much of the build up was in what was not shown and it was beautifully put-together! Fantastics performances especially Javier Bardem's haunting portrayal! Film ending was initially a downer, but weirdly part of the mystery.

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • brilliant first half, then it goes horribly wrong

     1

    the critic

    Nobody (?)

    The first half had me on the edge of my seat and here I was looking for another half of thrilling suspense and it flopped. It lost all direction and looked like somebad patch up job. Did they run out of ideas? run out of money? Nothing flowed, nothing worked.

    save your money for a movie where the directors don't sell out, and the wannabe artistic types don't hype it up. Shame on them.

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • Absolute crap

     1

    razor

    Nobody (?)

    Would give it no stars if i could What a waste of time and money most boring movie ive ever seen hopefuly they dont try to make anymore of Cormac McCarthy novels into movies because it realy was crap,Oh but i did like the shotgun with the silencer.

    Agree? Disagree?...
  • You got Chigurh comin' to ya

     4

    Marty

    Nobody (?)

    The Coens have been pretty disappointing in recent years after a string of superb thrillers put them on top of the pile in the early nineties, and this is their best effort since Fargo.

    The characterisation of the two leads (and a half if you count Tommy Lee's sheriff) is done brilliantly and the movie takes next to no time to drag you in with an intensely watchable first half. I'd go as far as to say that the first two-thirds of the movie set a new standard for the thriller genre, as rarely have I been so drawn into a story as I have this manhunt.

    It plays out like one of those bad dreams where you can't shake a baddie, and in Javier Bardem's Anton Chigurh the silver screen has been given one of its most absolutely terrifying baddies yet. Goodbye Hannibal Lecter, by rights Chigurh should replace you in the lexicon as a name associated with psychopaths.

    So why did they mess up the last third? I'll try to avoid spoilers here, but they could have given us the plot twist in a less mind-boggling way and still adequately put across the film's ultimate meaning. Instead we get David-Lynched with a was-he-in-the-room was-he-not-in-the-room psychological shambles.

    Unlike a few reviewers who seemed to think the movie ran a bit slowly, I was left wanting more. A movie that's so well paced for two thirds shouldn't just have a "beers lead to more beers" moment and drunkenly shift tack the way it did. Million Dollar Baby did that and I'd list it as the worst Best Picture winner I've ever seen. No Country for Old Men survives being ruined, but leaving out the movie's pivotal action scene, and a couple of other linking scenes which would have drawn us towards the conclusion better, left me asking questions for the last week.

    Suppose it's a good sign that film can still make us think so hard.

    Agree? Disagree?...

Write your review...

  • After submitting your review, you will need to login or signup to Flicks.
    Don't worry though, we'll keep your review and post it after you're done.

Press Reviews

  • BBC

     5

    No Country can be enjoyed as a straightforward genre thriller (and there are suspense sequences here that rival the best of Hitchcock) but it is worth digging a little deeper to expose the bedrock of aching sadness beneath the brutality.
    Read full review

  • Christchurch Press [Margaret Agnew]

     4

    1/2 The Coen brothers sure know how to spin a yarn. With a surprising amount of wry humour for such a bloody and grim tale, No Country for Old Men may well be their greatest yarn yet.
    Read full review

  • Empire Magazine [UK]

     5

    Violent, poetic, gripping, thrilling and blackly funny: that’ll be the Coens doing what they do best then. Now with added humanity...
    Read full review

  • NZ Herald [Peter Calder]

     5

    They have given us the ridiculous (The Ladykillers and The Hudsucker Proxy) and the sublime (Fargo and The Big Lebowski). The Coen brothers' newest is their best yet...
    Read full review

  • Sunday Star-Times [Barney McDonald]

     4

    The Coens' latest film is drawing comparisons to one of their earliest, Miller's Crossing. It's certainly one of their least amusing pictures and suggests a suitable way forward for the brothers, who seemed to lose their edge in recent years. It has all the elements of a classic, although it does jump between scenes and settings a little haphazardly. Thankfully, it has Bardem to hold everything together...
    Read full review

  • TV3 [Kate Rodger]

     4

    1/2 A great story is unravelled in the most enthralling and unexpected way, with some dark funny moments and some outstanding performances including not nearly enough of Woody Harrelson and Kelly McDonald.
    Read full review

  • Variety [USA]

    A scorching blast of tense genre filmmaking shot through with rich veins of melancholy, down-home philosophy and dark, dark humor, No Country for Old Men reps a superior match of source material and filmmaking talent.
    Read full review

Search For a DVD

I beg your pardon?

  • Flicks.co.nz is serving the great nation of NZ with all things cinematic. Question about a movie or cinema? Thoughts on the site? Quips, gripes, advice for our own personal self-development?
  • Get in touch with us by email at ED@ FLICKS.CO.NZ,on TWITTER oron FACEBOOK.

Flicks User Ratings

Find out more