FLICKS.CO.NZ

Out now on demand, Out now on dvd/blu-ray

Water for Elephants, Movie

Water for Elephants 2011

Trailers
Reviews
Stuff

Period romance set in a traveling circus, starring Robert Pattinson and Reese Witherspoon. Based on the bestselling novel. More

Veterinary school student Jacob (Pattinson) meets and falls in love with Marlena (Witherspoon), a star performer in a circus of a bygone era. They discover beauty amidst the world of the Big Top, and come together through their compassion for a special elephant. Their relationship faces the wrath of Marlena's dangerous husband, August (Inglourious Basterds' Christoph Waltz). Hide

On demand

$12.99 - $14.99
(TO BUY)

DVD / Blu-Ray

Blu-ray

$14.99

112 votes / 19 comments The Talk

  • 67 %

    Want to See it

    What say you?

    • Nyup

      Why not? Could show a decent story.

    • Karen

      Awesome book, looks like a good movie

    • niki

      the book was great so hope the movie lives up to it - looking forward to seeing it

    • Megan

      The book was voted the most beloved in 2009 in our book club. Can't wait to see the movie :)

    • Mandy

      Wow this book was voted best book in our bookclub too, so vivid knew it would make a great movie, can't wait to see it

    • Darryn

      On the fence with this one. Cinematography looks stunning though...

    • Jay

      So.. He sucks the the water from the elephants neck?

    • rachael k

      well its nice to see rob NOT lookin scruffy post Twilight .. but i still will kinda miss him as edward .. but looks like ok movie though

    • Hana

      This book was amazing! One of my favourites! Should be a good film too. Especially with the actors who play the characters. :)

    • Alex

      Huh, rob pattinson looks like he could pull off a mildly decent performance. i hope i can get over my disdain for him to enjoy the movie

    • Jannina

      I read the book which was brilliant, trailer looks awesome and the characters look pretty right, so cant wait to see it!

    • gal

      Loved loved loved the book, I hope the Rob and Reese have as much chemistry as the two charcters have in the book .

    • Razza

      Saw it today. Loved it! A beautiful love story, reminded me of the notebook

    • Alana

      It was fantastic - they don't make many movies like this any more, it was delightful

    • aaliyah

      i really want to watch this movie because it looks really good!! :)

    • Sarah89

      Terrible acting and casting apart from Reese. Predictable and far fetched.

    • Erin

      My god robert pattinson is good looking

    • Glenda Hatch

      I loved this movie, thought it was great, so different from the usual, thought Rob did a great job and Reese your hair was amazing

    • Toryy

      i really want to watch this , heard its a good movie hoope it is !

  • CARE TO COMMENT?

    Want to see it?

 

Flicks.co.nz Review

Rating:

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

  • jane

    it the worst movie i have ever seen

  • Erin

    You obviously havent seen 'Coyote Ugly'

comment / reply
Rebecca Barry Hill Flicks Writer

Some films are so entertaining, their flaws can be forgiven. Such is the case with Water for Elephants. It’s an imperfect, schmaltzy beast that feels like a film from a bygone era, and not just because it’s set in the 1930s. This is no prequel or sequel; it doesn’t rely heavily on CGI. It’s a fast-paced adventure tale like they used to make ‘em, a slice of old-fashioned Hollywood that traverses tragedy, romance and exotic travel. Step right up folks and join the circus. More

Animal lovers may find it hard going watching the trained cats and star pachyderm, Rosie. The rest will likely thrill to its good versus evil characters, compelling theme of illusion and of course, the fact that Twilight’s Robert Pattinson plays the lead, Jacob.

He is really nice to look at, although his performance feels flat and uncertain, possibly because he’s playing opposite luminous Oscar-winner Reese Witherspoon, who puts in a capable performance as one of the circus’ star attractions. Pattinson is just as easily outshone by another fiery Oscar winner, Christopher Waltz who plays the antagonist, August.

There are a few too many holes in the logic, too. A knife appears a little too conveniently in one of the film’s climactic scenes and the old man narrative that bookends the story feels unnecessary (Since when did Hal Holbrook look anything like Pattinson?). But director Francis Lawrence keeps tensions high throughout, the costumes look authentic and the story – based on the bestselling novel of the same name by Sara Gruen – is riveting enough to make it feel like two hours well spent. Hide

The People's Reviews

Rating:

9 ratings and 9 reviews

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

Didnt like it.

Diedi Flicks Superstar (?)

Terrible casting and acting apart from Reese. Predictable and far fetched. Save your time and money.

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

  • Wait a minute, so the elephant knows Polish?

  • Andrew-Hedley

    Hi @Friday, we have amended the review to avoid confusion.

comment / reply

Which film were you watching?

friday Nobody (?)

Geez, Rebecca Barry. "It's not explained why Jacob can suddenly speak a strange language the elephant understands."
REALLY?
Because remember at the beginning of the film when Jacob is speaking POLISH to his POLISH parents who very soon after die in a car accident? And then remember how when he is frustrated with the elephant Jacob says something in POLISH and the elephant responds?
Jeez, its clear to me that you weren't paying attention when watching this film. That was hardly a confusing moment.
I thought the film was enjoyable. Nice to have a film with no CGI and special effects trying to buoy it along. Christopher Waltz is fabulous. I think Reese is great but didn't seem to wear her character convincingly. There were a few throwaway lines to make us believe she had a hard upbringing but she seemed to lack the steeliness such a character would have. Rob is doing better and better each film and is becoming a convincing leading man. He was very good in some of the more dramatic and physical scenes, but comes across as a little wholesome sometimes. But of course the elephant steals the show. Its a nice film. A fun romp. But not amazing.

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

Worth a watch :)

Hastley A-Lister (?)

Thinks its a bit better than the bad review it gets by the movie credits... perhaps wait till it's on DVD?

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

Really a period drama....

remcamoli Nobody (?)

I agree it is kind of old school and much of the charm of the movie was in the costumes and setting representing the bygone era of 1931. As such it was entertaining and I wasn't bored (although at one point in the middle I was almost bored !).

Robert was OK and Reese, let's face it, was just being Reese and neither of them were outstanding. However Christopher Waltz was fabulous as the sadist bad guy who was also charming and sorry for himself.

I actually quite liked the book end and thought the old guy was convincing physically at Robert P, remembering he was supposed to be at least 90 years old !

I you like Robert/Reese go pay and see it and enjoy, otherwise wait for the DVD and it would still be an OK evening. Not Oscar material tho....

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

Recommended

100WordReviews Flicks Superstar (?)

1931 wasn't a good year. The depression hit America hard. Water for Elephants captures this grim reality but manages to maintain the romanticism of the train-travelling big-top circus era. Pattison handles the leading role with a great deal of competency, though never seeming to transcend that level. This stands out more in comparison to the excellent performances given by Christoph Waltz and Reese Witherspoon. There are a number of vital elements that I wish were explored further and the ending's a bit too clean, but nevertheless, Water for Elephants is an engaging tale of beauty in a very ugly time.

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

A watchable period piece

Kim-Reilly A-Lister (?)

I don't get the Robert Pattinson thing so nearly didn't go to this movie, but I'm glad I did. A good adaptation from the book, it wasn't how I pictured it as I read the book and that can be a good thing. I ended up enjoying Pattinson in the role and Reese played her character well too. A good mix of characters, casting worked well and the whole premise of 1931 worked well. I actually enjoyed the way the movie started and finished in current time and then looked back. It worked well. I'd recommend this.

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

Okay

Olivia-Prasad Flicks Superstar (?)

Maybe it's because these type of movies are not my thing, but found it boring and predictable. Would not recommend.

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

I liked it!

Coraliee Flicks Superstar (?)

I didn't think I could imagine Robert Pattison without fangs and red glowing eyes, so thought that this movie would be terrible. I was happy to proved wrong, and thought he pulled off a great performance in this film. I hadn't read the book, so can't compare it to that. But enjoyed the film from start to finish and would definately recommend it.

  • AGREE? DISAGREE?...

comment / reply

Water for Elephants

delarge101 Flicks Superstar (?)

The story itself is wildly unrealistic, but Water for Elephants tells it cohesively with fine performances accompanied with rough, heartbreaking scenes of raw emotion.

Your rating / review...

Rate it:

Review it:

After submitting your review, you will need to login or signup to Flicks. Don't worry though, we'll keep your review and post it after you're done.

Press Reviews

60% of critics recommend

Consensus: "It's a tale tastefully told and beautifully filmed, but Water for Elephants suffers from a pronounced lack of chemistry between its leads."

ROTTEN TOMATOES SCORE. Read more reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.
A.V. Club

It's a tastefully managed, passionless melodrama, full of brooding looks and reasonably sweet moments, but typified by a scantly characterized central couple who bring no sense of engagement to their relationship. Full review.

Chicago Sun-Times (Roger Ebert)

In an age of prefabricated special effects and obviously phony spectacle, it's sort of old-fashioned (and a pleasure) to see a movie made of real people and plausible sets. Full review.

Christchurch Press (Margaret Agnew)

Water For Elephants is your typical love triangle (or quadrangle), but this swoony, dramatic, high-stakes romance has an old-timey twist. Full review.

Empire (UK)

Familiar but enjoyable. Not being funny, the elephant (Rosie, played by nine-foot enchantress Tai) is the real star as the most moving and only joyful presence in sight. Full review.

Hollywood Reporter

Will please fans of Sara Gruen's best seller, but it lacks the vital spark that would have made the drama truly compelling on the screen. Full review.

New York Times

Short-circuits the novel's quirky charms and period atmosphere by its squeamish attitude toward gritty circus life and smothers the drama under James Newton Howard's insufferable wall-to-wall musical soup. Full review.

Otago Daily Times (Christine Powley)

Clumsy, cruelly disappointing... Full review.

Otago Daily Times (Christine Powley)

Clumsy, cruelly disappointing... Full review.