Archive

Alvin and the Chipmunks

Alvin and the Chipmunks 2008

Alvin, Simon, Theodore... A shameless reprise or bringing an animated treasure to a new generation? 80s toon 'Alvin and the Chipmunks' cracks the big screen with Jason Lee (tv's My Name Is Earl) and three singing, CGI mini rodent brats.

Starring Jason Lee, Justin Long, Matthew Gray Gubler, Jesse McCartney

Directed by Tim Hill ('Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties', 'Max Keeble's Big Move', 'Muppets from Space')

Written by Don Rhymer, Jon Vitti

Comedy, Family | 1hr 30mins | Origin: USA

Flicks review

  • Glides effortlessly past bad, sashays gleefully through terrible and passes through the other side of awful to emerge as utterly reprehensible.

    The titular three malformed, hypersexual, anally-fixated, scatologically-obsessed affronts to God’s creation wreak their havoc across a variety of mortifying set pieces with the aid of poor patsy Jason Lee. A closet Scientologist, Lee now has his own travesty to place on his mantel aside Battlefield Earth and the entire offscreen life of Tom Cruise.

    The story is perfectly acceptable, provided that this is the first work of narrative entertainment one has ever encountered; anyone who has ever seen or read or heard anything else in the world, however, will quickly grow tired of the woeful deficiencies in plot, character, internal logic, possibility on this world or any other. (The central conceit – talking chipmunks! - we will allow by virtue of the standard filmic device of the One Implausible Object, or, if you are of a spiritual bent, as proof of the physical presence of evil in the world).

    This wide-eyed disbelief will compete with one's groaning disgust at the story itself, which is probably the single most wilfully clichéd thing ever written. Again, if entirely unversed in narrative, one could almost miss this; however, if this were the case, the movie would be utterly incomprehensible, revolving as it does around incredibly lame digs at the music industry circa whenever Alvin and the Chipmunks could last be seen on syndicated television. (Breaking point reached through ethical umbrage at the notion of lipsynching? Seriously??)

    Children, who the film addresses as sexually precocious little brand-junkies, deserve better. Adults will invariably feel a subtle, unshakeable malaise. If you, out there in Internet-Land, are contemplating having children, you would do well to bring them into the world, for the specific purpose of forbidding them to witness this monstrosity.

    By Tom Goulter, Flicks.co.nz

 Our Rating       1

The Peoples voice

  • alright

     4

    it was kinda stink in the begining but it got more entertaining near the end

    By jay jay

  • excellent

     5

    this movie was so sweet. i loved it so much. i am sure the Squeakquel will be just as good.

    By samuel

  • faaaaaaaaaaaaa neeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

     4

    this is faaaaaaaaaaa neeeeeeeeeeeeeee i rec emend it its great

    By tomy

  • funny and quick

     5

    saw this for the second time and my kids and their friends laughed alot. Jason Lee was good and different from My Name is Earl series. Music and music industry stuff was clear and I liked how Jason Lee wanted the chipmunks to be/stay kids

    By ken burns

  •  1

    Amazingly poor. I feel sorry for my children. How can anyone like this? I felt dumber, and my kids looked dumber, after seeing it.

    By Steven the DAD

  • cool

     5

    gud and funni movie

    By tong

  • funny

     5

    this movie is so funny.

    By jerome

  • So cute!!!

     5

    I thought this movie was a real family one. It has very cute chipmunks and they are just making a mess anywhere, anytime! I recommend this movie to anyone who loves a giggle and a awww!

    By Olivia

  • Kiwis can't relate

     3

    I thought the movie was average. Mainly because us Kiwis can't relate to chipmunks. Then there is the issue of not being able to understand the chipmunks' speech. On reflection it did not matter that much as most of the film was slapstick. The warm fuzzies certainly couldn't beat Puss n Boots hat in hand and weepy eyed from Shrek.

    By Phread

 Collective Voice    0000000000004.50

Your review has been posted, you have spoken, and for that we thank you. – Ed.

Tell us all that is right or wrong with this flick:

  • 1 2 3 4 5

Press Reviews

  • Empire Magazine [UK]

    2 2 out of 5 stars

    Fun musical numbers and cartoonish humour give way to a bland sermon about the evils of the music industry...
    Click to read the full review

  • Los Angeles Times

    There is sweetness here. The scene in which Dave and the boys decorate the tree is charming, and the Chipmunks' excited presentation of gifts to their human dad is actually sort of touching. And dang it, the little animated rodents are cute...
    Click to read the full review

  • Premiere Magazine [USA]

    At times funny, and even occasionally witty, Alvin and the Chipmunks is a lively, entertaining romp that will certainly bring smiles to the young ones this holiday season....
    Click to read the full review

  • The Hollywood Reporter

    Unfortunately, as rendered here by the average-looking CGI effects, the characters are underwhelming in their appeal, lacking the charm of their previous animated incarnations....
    Click to read the full review

  • Total Film Magazine [UK]

    2 2 out of 5 stars

    The under-10s will doubtless succumb to the stuffed-toy cuteness of Alvin (the leader), Simon (the brainy one) and Theodore (the fat, needy one) as they invade the life of loser songwriter Jason Lee. But anyone older, will quickly tire of a pencil-thin plot that leaves Lee looking bemused (read: semi-comatose) when the ‘Munks parlay the success of their first festive hit into crass corporate whore-dom (ahem…)...
    Click to read the full review

Search the Archive

Win Yourself