The Curse of the Weeping Woman(2019)
She wants your children.
One of the longest-standing legends in American folklore, the tale of La Llorona, gets its own horror film from the producers of The Conjuring.... More
In 1970s Los Angeles, La Llorona is stalking the night—and the children. Ignoring the eerie warning of a troubled mother suspected of child endangerment, a social worker and her own small kids are soon drawn into a frightening supernatural realm. Their only hope to survive La Llorona’s deadly wrath may be a disillusioned priest and the mysticism he practices to keep evil at bay, on the fringes where fear and faith collide.
This is the feature debut of Michael Chaves, who is in line to direct The Conjuring 3.Hide
On Demand, DVD & Blu-Ray
Available from 4 providers
BY Aaron Yap Flicks Writer
Unless an extraordinary lift in quality control is instated, perhaps prioritising things like fresh ideas and a reason to care, The Curse of the Weeping Woman might be my last excursion into the non-James-Wan-directed reaches of so-called The Conjuring Universe. Whatever initial excitement I had about the franchise’s lofty ambitions to weave a decades-spanning tapestry of interconnected supernatural stories and characters has now been dulled into a stupor of indifference.... More
Narratively almost indistinguishable from last year’s The Nun, Weeping Woman is a prime example of stock-standard that’s sometimes even more difficult to endure than something that’s breathtakingly bad. It’s a bummer really, as the Mexican folklore it’s based on—the child-drowning apparition known as La Llorona—intrigues, and could have made for a rich, elegant, atmospheric horror flick, instead of this insubstantial cheapie.
Thus far, it’s the one with the least connective tissue to the universe. Apart from an appearance by Annabelle’s Father Perez (Tony Amendola), serving as exposition-dumper giving us a crash course in La Llorona’s origins, Weeping Woman lacks the gimmicky distraction of joining-the-dots, which means all attention is drawn, rather unfavourably, towards its desiccated corpse of a story. Linda Cardellini, always reliable even in the most average of fare, deserves better, while Raymond Cruz’s show-stealing grizzled, sardonic shaman deserves his own movie.
Director Michael Chaves’ attempts to juice up the tired beats with Wan-like kineticism falls flat, his reliance on endless, arbitrary jump scares gradually elicit more boredom than frights. There doesn’t seem to be any interest here beyond making a quick buck—and it doesn’t even come with any indication of a satisfying pay-off in sight. Not even a powerful, stone-collecting purple dude waiting to be defeated, or something.Hide
The Peoples' Reviews
Your rating & reviewRate / Review this movie
Rate and/or review
The Curse of the Weeping Woman
BY butch181 superstar
The Curse of the Weeping Woman is a very straightforward horror flick that has a very simple plot. There are no deep meanings, no real themes, and no important lessons to be learnt from it. It sets up the premise of *thing... More exists* quite well, and does put some effort into explaining the lore of the legend to the audience, but as the film progresses, the plot peters out as the jumpscares build in frequency.
That is the backbone of the film; jumpscares. But they take it to the extreme. Every single scene is a chain of potential jumpscare points, and you watch as the character--slowly, in dead silence, alone, unarmed, and generally in the dark--wanders straight into these danger spots. You sit there heart racing, gripping your seat, waiting to see which point will have the jumpscare, seething through the several misdirections until the scare finally happens, and it resets and starts again with no time for rest. As a result, every scene takes forever to go through and does little to build on the plot.
The length of these jumpscare scenes will either be a selling point or a breaking point. For the group of people in the theatre with me, The Curse of the Weeping Woman almost became a screening of The Room (which was released 16 years ago and still has regular screenings) because some of the characters choices are just so laughable. Once one member of the audience cries out in frustration the whole audience starts to join in; yelling when doors and windows are left unlocked, children are left unattended, or people walk into a dark room to investigate a sound. Like a strange bonding experience, the horror takes on entertainment value for those that are just looking to have fun.
If you are an avid horror fan, however, you will glean nothing from this film. It has all of the horror clichés, some well done, some creative, but most come off bland, at it does nothing to add to the genre.
The casting did work quite well. Having a Caucasian in the lead role was a bit annoying as you have to waste time with more jumpscares trying to get through the "doubt" stage in the second act, but overall, the set-up of the characters did a good job at creating characters that you cared about. While there was no real stand-out performance from the child actors, they were good in that they weren't overly annoying as many kids in horror films tend to be. There were certainly some questionable decisions on their part, but in general, they were satisfactory. Patricia Velásquez and Raymond Cruz were the best performances from the side of the adults with Velásquez providing a very emotional display, and Cruz adding in some nice dry humour.
This film is a part of The Conjuring universe, but apart from a couple of scenes with a character from the first Annabelle film, The Curse of the Weeping Woman is its own standalone film.
It's well-shot with some nice cinematography and an easy-to-follow story that manages to keep you engaged right the way through, but it does not add anything new to the genre and is far too reliant on jumpscares. Nothing worth critiquing, but The Curse of the Weeping Woman is great if you want to laugh at some scares with a bunch of mates.Hide