How an obscene Santa slasher birthed one of horror’s weirdest franchises

A 2025 reboot adds fresh weirdness to a franchise that’s veered from sleazy ’80s outrage to psychic fever dreams, feminist insect horror, androids and killer toys.

The 1984 Silent Night, Deadly Night is the nastiest holiday slasher ever made. Mean-spirited and sleazy, it’s a slice of Reagan-era nihilism that triggered protests and a temporary theatrical ban for sacrilegiously soiling Christmas. Then, somehow, that scuzzy little shocker spawned one of the most fascinatingly strange franchises in horror history. In the time since, it’s delivered the likes of a feminist bug-cult body horror, an epically cynical clip-show cash-grab, an auteur’s arthouse coma-slasher, and now a genuinely surprising 2025 reinterpretation.

This kind of franchise evolution simply wouldn’t be possible today. Thanks to the internet, mainly, studios can’t trick audiences into paying to see something with false advertising. But it used to be all the rage. Posters lied, taglines misled and barely competent filmmakers got to try out all sorts of weird shit. Horror franchises were foolishly keen on going to space, or ‘the hood’. A baffling number had at least one entry all about telekinesis.

Today’s industry has strict IP-management while fans have instant online fact-checking and global marketing scrutiny, so such chaos couldn’t occur—for good and bad. But even amid that chaos of yesteryear, the Silent Night, Deadly Night franchise is especially chaotic.

The aggressively unpleasant tone along with the defiling of Christmas makes the original film a genre standout. It throws sexual assault and child abuse into main character Billy’s grim, overextended backstory, before he snaps and goes on a murderous rampage in a Santa suit. Even when things get a bit silly, there’s a persistent layer of sinister cruelty underneath it all.

That changed in the first sequel—well, the second half of it. Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2, released in 1987, is an unbelievable scam of a movie. Over half of its 88-minute running time is replayed scenes from the first movie. Seriously. The few new scenes depict the original killer’s brother going on his own spree, and they’re abysmal, but in a so-bad-it’s-good way. The miscast muscle-man lead bellowing “garbage day” while shooting a guy holding a bin is the most memorable moment, eventually becoming a meme.

Inexplicably, Monte Hellman of Two-Lane Blacktop fame decided to take the reins next, making the oddly boring Silent Night, Deadly Night 3: Better Watch Out!. In it, the antagonist is a slow-moving medical experiment, brain exposed in a transparent dome, who shuffles after a blind woman he shares a psychic link with. It’s like a sedated romance flick with occasional stabbing, drenched in a surreal yet dull atmosphere that replaces the killer Santa stuff, or anything fun. Better Watch Out! had the tiniest of threads connecting it to the previous films, but that was completely severed in the follow-up.

Brian Yuzna’s Silent Night, Deadly Night 4: Initiation took the weirdness to all new heights with witches, gross giant cockroach mutants, possession and body metamorphosis. Christmas is window dressing, at best, and it has zero Santa kills. What it does have is an insane scene where a large larvae is forced into the protagonist’s body, which it works its way through before she vomits it out.

Less than a year later came Silent Night, Deadly Night 5: The Toy Maker with deadly toy traps and a few horny androids. It is deeply weird. Again, it has nothing to do with the previous films, although some of the cast and crew from Initiation reappear… thanks to the productions overlapping. That gives you an idea of just how much of a churn this had become. There is sex and violence in the fifth film, but it’s very forgettable direct-to-video early ‘90s vibes… until the seriously entertaining android fight at the end comes along and makes it well worth a watch.

Now the 2025 reinterpretation is upon us and, against every reasonable expectation, it’s a delight. Instead of treating the killer-Santa figure as a one-note engine for carnage, it leans into his sympathetic side more than ever, giving him a surprising emotional centre without softening the R-rated brutality. It nods to the first two films without drowning in winky nostalgia, clearly made by people who have genuine affection for the legacy.

The mythology is evolved and, while not every experiment lands, the film absolutely takes some swings, the wildest of which is pushing earnestly into supernatural territory. I know how bad that sounds, but honestly, it works. It is not prestige horror, or anything close to great cinema, but it’s far more confident, stylish and creative than a 2025 reboot of Silent Night, Deadly Night has any right to be.

That the new film is any good at all is a surprise. That it’s genuinely inventive, emotionally grounded, and meaningfully adds to one of the most bizarre franchises ever assembled? That’s about as close to a Christmas miracle as horror movies get.